During the COVID Plandemic, sales of ivermectin soared by 829% as it was called a "miracle drug" in preventing people from becoming sick or dying from COVID.
Dr. Pierre Kory M.D., president of the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), was ivermectin’s leading proponent who referred to it as a "miracle drug" that had a long history of safe usage, primarily as an anti-parasite drug.
But was the public, primarily through the Alternative Media, given the whole story on the safety protocol of ivermectin?
Before going any further in this article, I want to address the main objection that most will have by simply reading the title of this article, which is that studies were fabricated during COVID to discredit ivermectin so that the much more dangerous drug, remdesivir, could be given emergency use authorization to treat COVID patients.
The evidence of ivermectin as an "anti-fertility" drug that is not recommended for pregnant women, however, long precedes 2020 and the year of the COVID scam.
Forget the farmers! Dutch government is now taking people's HOMES too
Redacted, June 22, 2023
The Dutch government was successful in seizing farms and now they want to take over private homes too. The Housing Act will allow municipalities to force homeowners to sell their homes ONLY to people with a lower to middle income in the value of the home is less than 355,000€. Research shows that this will drive housing prices UP and cost of rent too. It is a shocking power grab in the year 2023.
Bringing back neglected crops: A food and climate solution for Africa
by Lysiane Lefebvre, David Laborde, and Valeria Pińeiro, June 21, 2023
Recent scientific findings have revealed chromothripsis-like effects after the application of CRISPR/Cas gene editing in the genome of tomatoes, reports Testbiotech in an article commenting on a just-published preprint study. Chromothripsis refers to a phenomenon in which often several hundred genetic changes occur simultaneously in a catastrophic event. Many sections of the genetic material can be swapped, recombined, or even lost if this occurs. It has been known for some time that chromothripsis occurs in mammalian (and human) cells. But now this effect has also been demonstrated in plants after gene editing applications. The findings show that gene editing applications cause unintended genetic alterations much more frequently than previously thought, affecting large parts of the genome. Commenting for GMWatch, molecular geneticist Dr Michael Antoniou said, "Yet again we see a phenomenon that has already been observed in a human cell context – major DNA damage from gene editing : now appearing in plants. Due to the inadequate analysis that is generally done in gene-edited plants, GMO developers will often miss this. So we will end up with marketed products with major genetic rearrangements affecting the function of many genes, even disturbing the balanced expression of multiple gene families, with unknown downstream consequences to the biochemical composition of the plant. Those consequences could include the production of new toxins and allergens. Yet gene editing is claimed to be more precise than natural breeding. Clearly this is not the case."
US Climate Czar Announces War Like Effort to Shut Down American Food Supply
by Greg Reese, May 31, 2023
GMO risk assessment – a "fact-free" exercise
by Claire Robinson, June 1, 2023
At a conference in honour of Dr Árpád Pusztai, Prof Vyvyan Howard exposed ongoing regulatory failure over GM crops and foods.
On 26-27 May, I attended a two-day conference in Edinburgh called The Integrity of Science, about the conflicts between corporate interests, public policy, and independent science, in honour of the late Dr Árpád Pusztai (1930–2021).
In the late 1990s Dr Pusztai carried out important experiments to test the safety of GMO potatoes and found that they harmed the health of rats. In 1998 he went public with his findings, saying on British TV that he would not eat GM potatoes and thought it was "very unfair to use our fellow citizens as guinea pigs" for GMO technology.
For his pains, he was fired from his institute and gagged from speaking about his research, which was later peer-reviewed and published in The Lancet. The potatoes were destroyed and the experiments never followed up. So scientists still do not know why the GM potatoes unexpectedly proved to be toxic. (The definitive account of the whole extraordinary drama of Pusztai's groundbreaking research and the attempts to destroy his reputation is described by the author and investigative journalist Andy Rowell in two carefully referenced chapters of his book, Don't Worry, It's Safe to Eat, republished with Andy Rowell's permission by GMWatch.)
This conference was a memorial and tribute to this great scientist and humanitarian, who stood up for scientific integrity against massive pressure from the scientific establishment and corporate interests. The presentations, by a stellar lineup of international speakers, looked at the state of scientific integrity in history and now. Shockingly, things have got no better since Dr Pusztai had his career destroyed, and in some ways they are worse.
.gif)
Recent scientific findings have revealed chromothripsis-like effects after the application of CRISPR/Cas gene editing in the genome of tomatoes, reports Testbiotech in an article commenting on a just-published preprint study. Chromothripsis refers to a phenomenon in which often several hundred genetic changes occur simultaneously in a catastrophic event. Many sections of the genetic material can be swapped, recombined, or even lost if this occurs. It has been known for some time that chromothripsis occurs in mammalian (and human) cells. But now this effect has also been demonstrated in plants after gene editing applications. The findings show that gene editing applications cause unintended genetic alterations much more frequently than previously thought, affecting large parts of the genome. Commenting for GMWatch, molecular geneticist Dr Michael Antoniou said, "Yet again we see a phenomenon that has already been observed in a human cell context – major DNA damage from gene editing : now appearing in plants. Due to the inadequate analysis that is generally done in gene-edited plants, GMO developers will often miss this. So we will end up with marketed products with major genetic rearrangements affecting the function of many genes, even disturbing the balanced expression of multiple gene families, with unknown downstream consequences to the biochemical composition of the plant. Those consequences could include the production of new toxins and allergens. Yet gene editing is claimed to be more precise than natural breeding. Clearly this is not the case."
On 26-27 May, I attended a two-day conference in Edinburgh called The Integrity of Science, about the conflicts between corporate interests, public policy, and independent science, in honour of the late Dr Árpád Pusztai (1930–2021).
